![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Washington (AFP) Dec 17, 2010 The White House's Democratic allies in the US Senate should drop plans to repeal a military ban on gays serving openly or risk the fate of a nuclear pact with Russia, a Republican senator said Friday. Republican Senator Bob Corker, who has played a key role in debates on the new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), urged Democrats to scrap plans to hold a key vote Saturday on ending the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" prohibition. Speaking on the floor of the Senate, Corker said that procedural vote, and another on an immigration provision, "poisons the well on this debate on something that's very, very important." "I'm hoping that those will be taken down or I don't think the future of the START treaty over the next several days is going to be successful, based on what I'm watching," in meetings with fellow Republicans, he warned. Corker said he hoped "saner minds will prevail" and that Democrats will abandon their push for the two votes, which he condemned as being "strictly there for political gain." In response, Democratic Senator John Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said "my hope is that everybody will simply rise above whatever, however they want to view these votes." Number-two Senate Republican Jon Kyl, his party's point man on the treaty, seemed to echo Corker when asked whether there was any connection between the treaty and the repeal vote. "The only linkage is that the problem of having all of these political votes is that it certainly doesn't help create an atmosphere of cooperation on other issues," he said. Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid late Thursday set the stage for key test votes Saturday on the DREAM Act to help children of undocumented immigrants and the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" repeal. The immigration measure was expected to fail, but Democrats were thought to have the 60 votes needed to end debate on the repeal. Corker's warning came as leading Republicans have worked to kill the nuclear arms control accord or at least put off a final vote until next year in what would be a severe blow to President Barack Obama. The agreement -- which has the support of virtually every present and past US foreign policy or national security heavyweight -- restricts each nation to a maximum of 1,550 deployed warheads, a cut of about 30 percent from a limit set in 2002, and 800 launchers and bombers. The accord would also return US inspectors who have been unable to monitor Russia's arsenal since the treaty's predecessor lapsed in December 2009. Asked about the Republican warnings, Senate Armed Services Committee chair Carl Levin, a Democrat who has played a key role in both matters, replied: "I would hope they wouldn't do that. I mean we ought to pass them both." And pressed on which of the two issues he would give up, Levin replied: "I'm not choosing between my children." Senator John McCain, the top Republican on Levin's committee, accused Reid of setting up votes aimed at stoking the Democratic base for "political advantage" and warned Republicans were "just growing weary" of such maneuvers. But McCain stopped well short of tying the treaty to the Saturday votes.
earlier related report The deeply divided House of Representatives was to vote on Obama's deal to avert a massive New Year's tax hike after Democrats try to toughen its inheritance tax provisions -- a step Republicans warn would scuttle the deal. Obama won a 13-month extension of jobless benefits and a two-year extension of middle-class tax cuts due to expire January 1 at the cost of also extending rate reductions for the richest US earners and rolling back the estate tax. The White House has argued the plan will boost US growth and help bring down stubbornly high unemployment now near 10 percent, while Democrats on the party's left flank have assailed what they view as a giveaway to the rich. Obama has urged lawmakers to defeat an amendment to toughen the inheritance tax, and approve the overall package, sending him the legislation to sign with ample time before tax rates rise on most American families come January 1. At the same time, the polarized Senate formally dove into a bitter debate on the new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), with Republicans dead-set on killing the accord or at least putting off a final vote until next year. The White House's foes will formally take control of the House when a new US Congress convenes in January and see their numbers swell in the Senate as a consequence of their November 2 rout of Democrats. Obama won a critical victory when lawmakers voted 66-32 Wednesday to take up the pact despite fierce Republican charges -- flatly denied by the Pentagon -- that it will cripple US missile defense plans. That margin put Democrats within striking distance of the 67 votes needed to ratify START, and one of two lawmakers absent, Democratic Senator Evan Bayh, has pledged to back the agreement, energizing the treaty's top champions. The effort gets more complicated some January, when Senate Democrats see their numbers shrink to 53 and they need to get 14 Republicans -- up from nine -- in order to approve the treaty. "We believe we should stay here as long as it takes to get this treaty ratified, and we are prepared to do so. There's no legitimate reason not to finish," said Senate Foreign Relations Committee chair John Kerry, a Democrat. Obama's defeated 2008 Republican White House rival, John McCain, also voted in favor of moving ahead, despite past criticisms that the president has "overhyped" the beneficialy effect it will have on ties with Moscow. But number-two Senate Republican Jon Kyl, the party's point-man on the treaty, has argued that there is not enough time to address his concerns about the treaty, and rallied his forces to defeat the accord. The agreement -- which has the support of virtually every present and former US foreign policy or national security heavyweight -- restricts each nation to a maximum of 1,550 deployed warheads, a cut of about 30 percent from a limit set in 2002, and 800 launchers and bombers. The accord would also return US inspectors who have been unable to monitor Russia's arsenal since the treaty's predecessor lapsed in December 2009. The Russian lower house of parliament, the State Duma, has indicated it will ratify the treaty only after the US Senate. US lawmakers face other bitter battles before breaking for the Christmas holiday, including a feud over a catch-all government spending bill for the fiscal year than began October 1.
Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com All about missiles at SpaceWar.com Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
![]() ![]() Washington (UPI) Dec 16, 2010 As U.S. President Barack Obama battles Senate Republicans over ratification of the new U.S.-Russia START treaty, it's worth remembering that the phrase at the heart of this treaty - "arms reduction" - was born 23 years ago this week, in a high-profile summit between the United States and the Soviet Union in Washington. Then, as now, to no one's surprise, the strongest voices of opposi ... read more |
![]() |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |