GPS News  
US Looking To Long-Term Presence In Iraq Says Gates

US Defense Secretary Robert Gates says US Troops may stay on the gorund in Iraq indefinitely.
by Staff Writers
Honolulu HI (AFP) Jun 01, 2007
US Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Thursday the United States is looking to a long-term military presence in Iraq under a mutually agreed arrangement similar to that it has long had with South Korea. Gates told reporters here that plans still call for an assessment of the US "surge" strategy in September but he was looking beyond that to the type of military presence the United States will have in Iraq over the long term.

"What I'm thinking in terms of is a mutual agreement where some force of Americans -- mutually agreed with mutually agreed missions -- is present for a protracted period of time," he said.

Gates, who was visiting the US Pacific Command here on the way to security talks in Singapore, pointed to South Korea, contrasting it to Vietnam "where we just left lock, stock and barrel."

US troops have been in South Korea since the end of the 1950-53 Korean War, with US generals in charge of combined US-South Korean forces in time of war.

"The idea is more a model of a mutually agreed arrangement whereby we have a long and enduring presence but under the consent of both parties and under certain conditions," he said.

"The Korea model is one, the security relationship we have with Japan is another," he said.

President George W. Bush also has alluded to the strategy shift in talking about a "Plan B-H," that would incorporate recommendations from a commission head by former secretary of state James Baker and former representative Lee Hamilton.

The Baker-Hamilton Commission proposed a phased reduction in US forces but leaving a small force to protect Iraq's borders and fight Al-Qaeda.

At the same time, Gates said US military commanders should not feel constrained by political pressure in Washington for a decision in September on whether to begin reducing US troop levels in Iraq.

Currently, there are about 147,000 US troops in Iraq but the total is expected to swell to about 160,000 over the next could of months.

Lieutenant General Raymond Odierno, the number two commander in Iraq, earlier told reporters in Washington via video link from Baghdad that he may not be able to make a full assessment by September of whether the buildup is succeeding in stabilizing Iraq.

Odierno said last month that the extra troops will be needed at least through early next year.

Asked about Odierno's latest comments, Gates said, "I don't think the goal post has changed really at all."

"I think he was saying basically that report can go a number of different ways, one of which is 'I need a little bit more time.'"

"When we receive the report from General (David) Petraeus and General Odierno we want them to focus on what is going on in Iraq," he said. Petraeus is the top US commander in Iraq.

"Our military commanders should not have to worry about the Washington clock. That is for us in Washington to worry about," he said.

Source: Agence France-Presse

Related Links
Iraq: The first technology war of the 21st century



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


New Iraq Troops For Buildup, Not Surge
Washington (UPI) May 30, 2007
On May 8, 2007, the U.S. Department of Defense notified 35,000 soldiers that they would be sent to Iraq for the upcoming round of deployments. While such notifications are now commonplace, the fact that so many have been notified indicates that President George W. Bush's "surge" of U.S. forces may not be so much of a short-lived surge, but rather an increase of troop strength that is intended to be sustained for some time.







  • Australia Fears Jet Flight Guilt Could Hit Tourism
  • Nondestructive Testing Keeps Bagram Aircraft Flying
  • New FAA Oceanic Air Traffic System Designed By Lockheed Martin Fully Operational
  • NASA Seeks New Research Proposals

  • Power Auto Group Debuts Fuel Efficient E-Vehicle Program
  • New Research Advances Energy Efficiency, Safety And Performance Of Public Transit
  • Hydrogen Breakthrough Could Open The Road To Carbon-Free Cars
  • Toyota To Launch 100-Percent Ethanol-Powered Cars In Brazil

  • Raytheon Demonstrates Joint C3I Warfighter Interoperability
  • Raytheon's MicroLight Radio Selected For UK Army's FIST Program Testing
  • General Dynamics To Provide Ku-Band Satellite On-the-Move Antenna System To Army
  • Raytheon Awarded USAF Global Broadcast Services Contract

  • Russia Missile Tests Aimed At US ABM Plans In Europe
  • Czech PM Says US Missile Base Is Question Of National Courage
  • Lithuania Fears Missile Attack From Rogue Nations
  • Unseemly ABM Situation

  • Space-Inspired Garden Takes Top Prize At UK's Chelsea Garden Show
  • Top Chef Warns Of Environmental Impact Of Fine Dining
  • Climate Change Threatens Wild Relatives Of Key Crops
  • Journal Details How Global Warming Will Affect The World's Fisheries

  • Locals Block Work At Indonesian Mud Volcano
  • Steel Dam Plan To Plug Indonesian Mud Volcano
  • Chinese Space Agency Joins The International Charter Space And Major Disasters
  • LSU And Los Alamos Team Up To Improve Evacuation Plans

  • Scientists Create Fire-Safe, Green Plastic
  • Canon And Toshiba Delay Launch Of New SED Televisions
  • Quasicrystals: Somewhere Between Order And Disorder
  • Space Technology Creates Investment Opportunities

  • Boeing Orbital Express Completes First Autonomous Free Flight And Capture
  • Robot Teams Handle Hazardous Jobs
  • Mr Roboto
  • Carnegie Mellon Unveils Internet-Controlled Robots Anyone Can Build

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright Space.TV Corporation. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space.TV Corp on any Web page published or hosted by Space.TV Corp. Privacy Statement