GPS News  
TIME AND SPACE
How long does a quantum jump take?
by Staff Writers
Vienna, Austria (SPX) Sep 25, 2018

A laser pulse hits a tungsten surface on which iodine atoms have been depositied. Both the tungsten atoms and the iodine atoms lose electrons, which can then be measured.

It was one of the crucial experiments in quantum physics: when light falls on certain materials, electrons are released from the surface. Albert Einstein was the first to explain this phenomenon in 1905, when he spoke of "light quanta" - the smallest units of light that we call photons today.

In tiny fractions of a second, an electron of the material absorbs a photon, "jumps" into another state and leaves the surface. This "photoelectric effect" is so fast that until now it has mostly been regarded as instantaneous - as a sudden change of state, from one moment to the next.

However, new measurement methods are so precise that it has now become possible to observe such a process and to measure its duration precisely. A team from the Vienna University of Technology, together with research groups from Garching, Munich and Berlin, determined the duration of the photoelectric effect at a tungsten surface. The results were published in the journal Nature.

Measuring on an attosecond scale
The photoelectric effect plays an important role in many technical fields, for example in solar cells or in the conversion of data from a fiber optic cable into electrical signals. It occurs on a time scale in the attosecond range - an attosecond is a billionth of a billionth of a second.

"With the help of ultra-short laser pulses, it has been possible in recent years to gain for the first time insight into the timing of such effects," explains Prof. Joachim Burgdorfer from the Institute for Theoretical Physics of the Vienna University of Technology.

"Together with our colleagues from Germany, for example, we were able to determine the time interval between different quantum jumps and show that different quantum jumps take different amounts of time."

However, until now it was only possible to determine time differences, but not the absolute duration, because it is very difficult to find a "clock", which begins to tick precisely at the beginning of the quantum jump. This is exactly what has become possible through the combination of several experiments, computer simulations and theoretical calculations.

Three atomic clocks
To achieve this, the scientists had to proceed step by step: in order to have an absolute, precisely calibrated reference scale, they first studied electrons ripped out of helium atoms by laser pulses. "The helium atom is very simple. In this case, we can accurately calculate the time evolution of the photoemission. For more complex objects, such as metal surfaces, this would not be possible even with the best supercomputers in the world," explains Prof. Christoph Lemell.

The helium atoms were then used as a reference clock. In a second experiment, the photoemission of helium and iodine was compared, thus calibrating the "iodine clock".

Finally, in the third and final step, it was possible to use the iodine atoms to study the photoemission of electrons from a tungsten surface - the effect, the team wanted to measure. The iodine atoms were deposited on a tungsten surface, which was then hit with ultrashort laser pulses. Now the iodine atoms served as a reference clock, with which the photoemission from the tungsten surface could be measured.

An ultrashort laser pulse is used as the starting signal with which the process begins. The electrons are released from their atoms and "jump" into a different quantum state, in which they can reach the tungsten surface and leave. "In tungsten, the duration of this process can be studied particularly well because the interface of the material can be defined very precisely there," explains Prof. Florian Libisch. "The tungsten surface is an excellent finish line for electron-time measurement."

The duration of the photoemission process depends on the initial state of the electrons. It ranges from 100 attoseconds for electrons from the inner shells of the tungsten atoms to 45 attoseconds for conduction band electrons, which on average pass the finish line faster. The measurements were carried out at the Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics in Garching (Germany). Florian Libisch, Christoph Lemell and Joachim Burgdorfer from the Vienna University of Technology were responsible for the theoretical work and computer simulations.

But, of course, the goal of the research project is not just measuring the duration of a quantum effect. "It is an exciting field of research that provides remarkable new insights - for example into surface physics, and into electron transport processes inside materials," says Joachim Burgdorfer. "It gives us the opportunity to study important physical processes with an accuracy that would have been inconceivable a few years ago."

Research paper


Related Links
Vienna University of Technology
Understanding Time and Space


Thanks for being here;
We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain.

With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords.

Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year.

If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.
SpaceDaily Contributor
$5 Billed Once


credit card or paypal
SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter
$5 Billed Monthly


paypal only


TIME AND SPACE
Searching for errors in the quantum world
Zurich, Switzerland (SPX) Sep 21, 2018
There is likely no other scientific theory that is as well supported as quantum mechanics. For nearly 100 years now, it has repeatedly been confirmed with highly precise experiments, yet physicists still aren't entirely happy. Although quantum mechanics describes events at the microscopic level very accurately, it comes up against its limits with larger objects - especially objects for which the force of gravity plays a role. Quantum mechanics can't describe the behaviour of planets, for instance, ... read more

Comment using your Disqus, Facebook, Google or Twitter login.



Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle

TIME AND SPACE
Farmers fume as France stands firm on more Pyrenees bears

EU palm oil ban sows bitter seeds for Southeast Asian farmers

Chinese actress has high hopes for her Bordeaux vineyard

Earliest Mediterranean cheese production revealed by pottery over 7,000 years old

TIME AND SPACE
DARPA contracts USC for circuit development program

New photonic chip promises more robust quantum computers

Tiny camera lens may help link quantum computers to network

Laser sintering optimized for printed electronics

TIME AND SPACE
NASA balloon mission captures electric blue clouds

Boeing to provide P-8 training systems for U.S. Navy, Australia

Boeing awarded $2.8B for 18 KC-46 tanker aircraft

United Technologies awarded $435M for F-35 work

TIME AND SPACE
Late to the party, German carmakers join race against Tesla

Drivers see red over Oslo's green 'war on cars'

EU targets BMW, Daimler, VW in pollution cartel probe

Paris, Brussels call for car-free day in Europe

TIME AND SPACE
US using false accusations on trade to 'intimidate' countries: China

US ports fear they will be big losers in trade war

'High uncertainty' hurting global growth, OECD says

WTO eyes China bid to slap stiff trade sanctions on US

TIME AND SPACE
Coastal wetlands will survive rising seas, but only if we let them

Coal plant offsets with carbon capture means covering 89 percent of the US in forests

Indigenous peoples, key to saving forests, catch a break

Natural mechanism could lower emissions from tropical peatlands

TIME AND SPACE
Quick and not-so-dirty: A rapid nano-filter for clean water

ECOSTRESS Maps LA's Hot Spots

Famous theory of the living Earth upgraded to Gaia 2.0

NASA's GOLD instrument captures its first image of the Earth

TIME AND SPACE
Cannibalistic materials feed on themselves to grow new nanostructures

First-ever colored thin films of nanotubes created

Nanotubes change the shape of water

Fast visible-UV light nanobelt photodetector









The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us.