GPS News  
From Tank Armor To Personal Armor Part Two

disclaimer: image is for illustration purposes only
by Martin Sieff
Washington (UPI) May 22, 2008
The "Iron Man" movie is in one key respect already a documentary reflection of reality: In Iraq, tens of thousands of U.S. soldiers over the past five years owe their lives to their Kevlar armor and ceramic implants.

Modern high-tech individual defensive armor for combat soldiers and police unfortunately is certainly not remotely as invulnerable as inventive genius Tony Stark's amazing alloy armor in the movie hit movie "Iron Man." But it serves the same purpose, and it looks like it will be a staple of the combat gear of major nations in 21st century industrialized/high-tech war.

In World War I, combat soldiers, especially on the Western Front, had no protective personal armor at all. Yet those young soldiers were thrown, especially by British and Russian commanders, in endless futile, tactical blunt and exceptionally incompetently directed frontal charges against German Wehrmacht -- at the time, certainly the most proficient and tactically best army in the world. Millions of young men hardly out of boyhood died as a result for no discernible gains.

It was to break the deadlock on the Western Front dominated by the fixed-site machine gun -- although the largest number of combat casualties on the Western Front was in fact caused by massed artillery -- that Britain's Royal Navy -- prodded on by its visionary First Lord of the Admiralty, the young Winston Churchill -- pioneered the heavy tank.

The colossal tanks of the British army on the Western Front in 1917-1918 were vastly larger than their World War II or 21st century successors. Their armored protection, in fact, was very thin; they moved at a snail's pace; they had a very limited operational range; and they broke down early and often.

Nevertheless, they had shown the way, and by World War II, armored cars, self-deployed guns, armored personnel carriers and battle tank weapons systems had developed to the state of being mature technologies.

The Germans and the Soviets developed and deployed by far the best, the Italians by far the worst, the British and Japanese tanks were almost as bad as the Italian ones, and the Americans were in the middle, far ahead of the British, Italians and the Japanese, but tank for tank, far behind the Germans and the Soviets.

The concept of individual armored protection for soldiers remained a science fiction pipe dream through both world wars and through the Korean and Vietnam wars as well. However, in the following decades, Kevlar protection was developed and became increasingly effective in its use by the U.S. Army and Marine Corps.

In Iraq, U.S. Bradley Fighting Vehicles have proven dangerously vulnerable to improvised explosive devices, and Sunni insurgents have been able to upgrade the shaped-charge, directed-blast potency of their IEDs to even disable and destroy a number of huge U.S. Abrams M1A2 Main Battle Tanks.

It should, however, be noted that the U.S. Army has not been negligent or complacent about this development, and major programs have been in operation for years now to upgrade Abrams MBT armored protection.

Next: Copying Iron Man in the air

Related Links
The latest in Military Technology for the 21st century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Tank Technology Stuck In The 1940s Part Two
Washington (UPI) May 8, 2008
The U.S. Army, which has only the most rudimentary understanding of operational art, has designed its tanks, especially the M-1 Abrams Main Battle Tank, for tactical utility with little thought for operational mobility. (William S. Lind, expressing his own personal opinion, is director for the Center for Cultural Conservatism for the Free Congress Foundation.)







  • China's new jumbo-jet firm no threat to Airbus, Boeing: state media
  • China unveils new jumbo jet company: report
  • NASA And JAXA To Conduct Joint Research On Sonic Boom Modeling
  • Analysis: Can airplanes go green?

  • Lithium Technology Powers Hybrid Electric Supercar
  • Professor Studies What Cars Can Learn From Drivers' Words
  • Free-Flowing Traffic With ORINOKO
  • Tesla's electric sports car aiming at Europe market

  • Raytheon Awarded Contract For Key Command And Control Solution
  • ATCi Introduces New Features To Its Warrior Satellite Surveillance System
  • Northrop Grumman Begins Installing New Engines On Joint STARS
  • Battlefield Airborne ComNode Enables Real-Time Distribution Of F-22 Data To Legacy Aircraft

  • Medvedev warns over US missile defence plans
  • White House sees Russia 'open' to talks on US missile plan
  • Russian ABM Plans Part Two
  • India Sees Agni-3 As Deterrent To China

  • European Parliament urges EU to set up 'food stocks'
  • French parliament adopts contested GM crops bill
  • CSIRO Consolidates Its Agricultural Research
  • Children's Gardens Mushrooming

  • More disaster awaits China's quake zone: official says
  • WHO rushes experts to quake-hit China
  • China makes global tent appeal, as quake death toll passes 50,000
  • China orders million 'recyclable' homes in quake zone

  • Self-Repairing Aircraft Could Revolutionize Aviation Safety
  • US, China Space Debris Still Orbiting Earth
  • Northrop Grumman Resonating Gyro Achieves 10 Million Operating Hours In Space
  • TerraSAR-X And NFIRE Fire Up The Pipe With Laser Data Transfer

  • Robot conducts Detroit orchestra
  • Canada rejects sale of space firm to US defense firm
  • The Future Of Robotic Warfare Part Two
  • Robot anaesthetist developed in France: doctor

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright Space.TV Corporation. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space.TV Corp on any Web page published or hosted by Space.TV Corp. Privacy Statement