GPS News  
Combating Land Warfare Threats In The 21st Century Part Three

disclaimer: image is for illustration purposes only
by Martin Sieff
Washington (UPI) Feb 18, 2008
The idea of a major land war similar in scale to the great battles of World War II, or even the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq War has largely been discounted by political pundits in the United States and by current and co would-be policymakers in both the Republican and Democratic parties.

However, it is striking that none of these prophets in their own imagination ever refer to the very clear pattern of arms acquisitions of Russia, China and India, the three main land powers on the Asiatic land mass. Yet the first decade of the 21st century has so far been marked by the slow but steady and relentless upgrading of the capabilities of all three powers to wage land war on a scale the Eurasian land mass has not seen in more than 60 years.

As we have noted in recent columns, India in December 2007 closed a deal with Russia to buy 347 more T-90S Main Battle Tanks in addition to the 310 it purchased in 2001.

The potential enemy the Indian army would have to face is quite clear: It would be it traditional enemy Pakistan, whose future looks increasingly unpredictable and unstable given the growth of extreme Islamist elements in popularity and political credibility, the assassination of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto and the increasingly uncertain future of current President Pervez Musharraf.

Russia certainly does not factor as a likely enemy of India in any foreseeable scenario. The two great nations have no areas of significant strategic conflict in the foreseeable future, and their alliance, transcending the vastly different political systems and political cultures they have, has now endured for more than 40 years.

India's relations with the United States have warmed dramatically over the past decade, and that process has steadily continued under both Republican and Democratic presidents in Washington and under Bharatiya Janata Party and Congress-UPA-led coalition governments in New Delhi, so the process enjoys bipartisan blessing on both sides.

Nevertheless, the energy and resources the Indians are investing in building up their conventional political power should serve notice that India is not going to be content to follow U.S. wishes on a wide range of security issues in South Asia but will be determined to have the power to act independently on its own behalf.

Despite the prognostications of doom by some Washington pundits, a China-India serious clash that could lead to direct armed hostilities seems extremely unlikely in the foreseeable future as well. Both countries face far more immediate security challenges -- India with Pakistan and China with Taiwan. And both of them therefore share a strong vested interest in keeping their rears safe and avoiding conflicts on multiple fronts.

As we have noted in previous columns, China's primary investment has been in building up missile, air and naval systems that could contest the U.S. armed forces in the Western Pacific in any contest over Taiwan. It is noteworthy that the Chinese have also put emphasis on holding military exercises involving amphibious landings on hostile shores -- a capability that would be most obviously relevant to threaten Taiwan.

Yet China has been seeking to build up its conventional land forces, too.

Next: Why China wants a large land army

Related Links
The latest in Military Technology for the 21st century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Dogs of War: The pay gap myth
Washington (UPI) Feb 15, 2008
Frequently in the history of military and security issues the public and policymakers take for granted the conventional wisdom of the day. That is, until it is proven false.







  • All-star line-up at first Singapore Airshow
  • Military Aircraft To Perform Aviation Safety Research
  • Birds Bats And Insects Hold Secrets For Aerospace Engineers
  • Flapping-wing airplanes are envisioned

  • Toyota unveils hybrid version of flagship Crown
  • India competes to draw big-name automakers
  • Carbon Capture Strategy Could Lead To Emission-Free Cars
  • London plans to punish gas-guzzling vehicles

  • EADS DS Delivers Army Command And Control Information System To Franco-German Brigade
  • Thompson Files: Electronic war blindness
  • Harris Provides American Forces Network With Broadcast System To Reach One Million Troops
  • Raytheon Wins Air Force Satellite Communications Contract

  • Missile Defense Globally Protects Against Toxic Satellite
  • Raytheon Finishes 2007 With Two Patriot Awards Totaling 377 Million USD
  • Only NKorean missile can 'wake up' Japan, says Tokyo governor
  • MEADS Passes PDR Milestone

  • Winemakers mull climate change at Barcelona conference
  • China struggles to avoid past mistakes in controlling food prices
  • Small farmers speak out against globalisation
  • Drought cuts 10 percent off Australian agricultural production

  • Thousands of Hong Kong factories in China may close: report
  • Trailers given to US disaster victims unsafe: CDC
  • 911 Calls Offer Potential Early Warning System
  • Robotic Rats To Aid In Rescue Missions

  • Expert: AI computers by 2020
  • Iran says its space probe sending data to earth
  • Lockheed Martin-Built A2100 Satellite Fleet Achieves 200 Years In Orbit
  • Game consoles can model black holes, drug molecules

  • Robot Plumbs Wisconsin Lake On Way To Antarctica, Jovian Moon
  • Can A Robot Draw A Map
  • Meet Blob The Robot
  • Russian Fuel Flows Into Jules Verne Automated Transfer Vehicle

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright Space.TV Corporation. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space.TV Corp on any Web page published or hosted by Space.TV Corp. Privacy Statement