 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Coal's Future Clouded By Global Warming Debate
Washington (AFP) March 18, 2007 Coal, the dominant fuel for electric power in the US, China and elsewhere, faces an uncertain future amid growing concerns about global warming and a race for new ways to curb emissions. Some experts say coal can still play an important role with new technology being developed to capture and store carbon dioxide emissions underground. But environmental activists, who have long seen coal as the biggest culprit in global warming emissions, cite an urgent need for incentives to reduce greenhouse gases from power plants. A study released Wednesday by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology concluded that coal can remain an attractive option from an environmental and economic standpoint if the right steps are taken. The key, the study concluded, is to move forward with technology to "sequester" or capture and store carbon dioxide (CO2) gases, blamed for global warming. There are no technical obstacles to sequestration of CO2 in geological formations, but this has not yet been used on a scale large enough to get commercial support, the study authors said, and no regulatory framework exists. The report said power plant operators will only have an incentive to use the new technology if there is a tax or cap on carbon emissions. "What is needed is to demonstrate an integrated system of capture, transportation, and storage of CO2, at scale," the report said. In the meantime, coal is a front-burner issue with energy needs increasing worldwide even as concerns about global warming are on the rise. In China, an average of one new coal-burning power plant is being started up each week, with little attention paid to emission controls. Coal provides 80 percent of China's electricity and two-thirds of its energy needs. And fast-growing India depends on coal for 70 percent of its electricity. In the United States, which produces half its electric power from coal, utilities have tentative plans for over 150 new coal-fired plants by 2030, even though Congress is mulling ways to curb greenhouse emissions. "The worst thing we could do in terms of global warming would be to build more coal-fired power plants," said Josh Dorner of the Sierra Club, who said most of the plants would use "the oldest and dirtiest technologies." Earlier this year, a private equity group offered to buy Texas utility giant TXU, hoping to sweeten the offer with a pledge to scrap eight of the group's 11 planned coal-burning generators. The MIT report warns of a "perverse incentive" to bring new coal-fired plants into service in anticipation of stricter emissions standards, with utilities expecting these would be exempted or "grandfathered" in any new regulations. "Congress should act to close this 'grandfathering' loophole before it becomes a problem," the report said. The MIT scientists said new coal plants that meet strict criteria for capturing greenhouse gases would likely have to be built from scratch, with retrofits impractical. This suggests the use of new "clean-coal" technologies, that also remove conventional pollutants such and sulfur and nitrogen oxides. Some call for "gasification" or converting the coal to a gas before burning, or using air-blown "pulverized" coal. Ernest Moniz, an MIT professor and co-author of the study, said these new technologies including carbon capturing could add about 50 percent to the wholesale cost of electric power and about 25 percent to the retail cost. With those added costs, "it's kind of a horse race" with other sources of power in terms of the price of electricity from coal, he said. Luke Popovich, spokesman for the National Mining Association, acknowledged "a confluence of several events that appear to have clouded coal's future." But he said coal is still preferable to alternatives for power generation -- more expensive natural gas, oil imports from unstable regions and ever-controversial nuclear energy. "There is an almost inexorable demand for electricity that no reasonable expectation of conservation practices can diminish," Popovich said. Sierra Club's Dorner admits coal will not disappear overnight but argued against increasing its use. "Clean coal doesn't really exist," he said, because of the impact from both mining and combustion. As for carbon storage, he said, "We don't have any idea whether or when this will be possible ... it's pie in the sky." Dorner said California has set a positive example by becoming more energy efficient. By also using renewable sources and "managing things better on the demand side, we won't need all these coal plants tomorrow," he added.
Source: Agence France-Presse Related Links Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com Our Polluted World and Cleaning It Up China News From SinoDaily.com Global Trade News The Economy All About Solar Energy at SolarDaily.com Civil Nuclear Energy Science, Technology and News Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com
China Bans New Small Coal-Based Power Generators
Beijing (AFP) March 7, 2007China will no longer allow new coal-based power generators with a capacity below 300,000 kilowatts to be built, hoping to alleviate pressure on the environment, state media reported Wednesday. New coal power generators should be equipped with facilities to reduce sulphur and soot emissions, the China Business News reported, citing the National Development and Reform Commission, the top planning agency. |
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright Space.TV Corporation. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space.TV Corp on any Web page published or hosted by Space.TV Corp. Privacy Statement |
