GPS News  
Britain approves new nuclear reactors, to Green fury

Areva looks to build six nuclear plants in Britain
Areva, the world's largest nuclear power group, on Thursday welcomed Britain's decision to build a new generation of such plants and said it wanted to build up to six of them. Areva said in a statement it was "delighted with the decision, which will boost investment in (Britain's) nuclear power generation." "It is our ambition to build at least four, and possibly six nuclear power plants in Britain," said Luc Oursel, head of Areva's nuclear reactor division. In June last year, Areva submitted details of its third generation nuclear power plant to the British authorities for review. Only last month, Areva chief executive Anne Lauvergeon said the company wanted to account for a third of all new nuclear reactors built worldwide between now and 2030, "Between now and 2030 we believe there could be 100 to 300 (nuclear reactors built around the world)," she said. "We want a third of that business." The British government on Thursday approved a new generation of nuclear power stations, describing evidence in support of the move as "compelling" while environmental groups attacked the decision as unwise and unnecessary.
by Staff Writers
London (AFP) Jan 10, 2008
The British government approved Thursday a new generation of nuclear power stations, describing the move as "compelling" but infuriating environmentalists who are considering a legal challenge.

The new stations are expected to be built by private companies without public subsidy to ensure future security of supplies and a balanced energy "mix", amid global concern over long-term oil and gas provision and cost.

"Set against the challenges of climate change and security of supply, the evidence in support of new nuclear power stations is compelling", Business Secretary John Hutton told parliament in a widely-expected announcement.

The move, applauded by unions and business leaders, follows calls from the pro-nuclear lobby for an early decision as most of the 19 reactors at Britain's 10 existing nuclear power stations will close by 2023.

The plants provide 19 percent of Britain's electricity.

Germany's E.On, France's EDF, and British Gas parent company Centrica all showed their eagerness to be involved, while the world's largest nuclear power group, French-owned Areva, said it wanted to build up to six new plants.

Britain's governing Labour Party called nuclear power an "unattractive" option as late as 2003, but has rethought as energy costs soar, initiatives against climate change intensify and North Sea oil and gas stocks dwindle.

It also follows an increasing global trend towards atomic power, which currently provides about 16 percent of the world's electricity.

But opponents, concerned over waste and safety, question whether atomic energy can help cut carbon emissions and want greater clarity on costs, plus assurances that consumers will not have to pay for eventual decommissioning.

Greenpeace last year won a legal challenge after complaining the government's consultation process was flawed. The group said it was studying closely the re-ordered consultation and had not ruled out fresh action.

The group, Friends of the Earth, Britain's third party the Liberal Democrats and the Green Party all want more emphasis on sustainable or renewable energy like wind, wave and tidal power.

Greenpeace executive director John Sauven said Thursday's announcement was "bad news", which would do little to meet targets for cuts in greenhouse gas emissions.

London Mayor Ken Livingstone called it "the mistake of a generation" at odds with Britain's aim to be the world's first low-carbon economy and leaving a "legacy" of radioactive waste for which the government had no proper strategy.

Hutton sought to address those concerns, saying nuclear power had been a "tried and tested, safe and secure form of low-carbon technology" for more than 50 years, and was more efficient and cost-effective than coal-fired stations.

Safety would be the top priority but he said it would be wrong to set a target for the amount of electricity to be produced by nuclear or any other form of low-carbon energy.

New plants were likely to be built on or near existing sites, he added, but failed to specify an exact number. Recent media reports here have suggested Brown is in favour of 10 new reactors.

He also made no mention of cost. The Guardian newspaper last July said six reactors could cost as much as 12 billion pounds (16 billion euros, 24 billion dollars) for six plants.

Hutton said the costs for developing, building, and operating the new plants -- which he hoped could be running by 2020 -- as well as disposing of nuclear waste would be met by energy companies, not the taxpayer.

The government would help with reforms to the planning process to fast-track applications, he added.

But new nuclear power stations in Scotland are likely to be blocked by the ruling left-of-centre Scottish National Party.

Although energy policy is controlled by ministers in London, the devolved government in Edinburgh has the power to block planning applications for new plants, which the Scottish government has vowed to do.

Related Links
Nuclear Power News - Nuclear Science, Nuclear Technology
Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Groups lobby for restrictions on US-India nuclear deal
Washington (AFP) Jan 9, 2008
Some 130 nuclear experts and non-governmental groups have sent letters to governments to a bid to lobby for curbs on a controversial US nuclear deal with India, officials said Wednesday.







  • Purdue Wind Tunnel Key For Hypersonic Vehicles And Future Space Planes
  • Antarctic ballooning hits milestone
  • Chinese major aircraft makers to build big planes: report
  • China's rolls out first home-made commercial jet

  • Launch Of Fisker Premium Hybrid At North American International Auto Show
  • India's low-cost car may prove too high a price to pay
  • GM says China ventures notch sales record
  • Automobile's future is electronic and green: GM chief

  • Northrop Grumman Team To Compete For US Army Aerial Common Sensor
  • JPEO Joint Tactical Radio System Announces Successful Momentum Of JTRS Program
  • Boeing To Build A Sixth Wideband Global SATCOM Satellite
  • Northrop Grumman And L-3 To Work Together In Bid For US Navy's EPX Aircraft

  • BMD Focus: Russian ABM warning -- Part 1
  • Lockheed Martin Concludes 2007 With Record Accomplishments In Missile Defense Capabilities
  • India to develop anti-missile defence system by 2010: official
  • Outside View: Japan goes ABM

  • Overgrazing Accelerating Soil Erosion In Northern Mexico
  • Australia looks to GM crops after scorching 2007
  • Fisheries Should Be Regarded As A Part Of The Maritime Environment
  • Illegal land grabs in China threatening food supplies: minister

  • WHO Says Only 151 000 Iraqis Died From Violence Since 2003 Invasion
  • Indonesian landslide, floods toll at 107 dead: health ministry
  • New Indonesia landslide as search for victims continues
  • Search intensifies for Indonesian landslide victims

  • Helicopter silencers used to turn all surfaces stereo
  • In world of convergence, mini-TVs get legs
  • Pocket-sized gadgets get picture projection power
  • Smaller Is Stronger - Now Scientists Know Why

  • ESA Training Team ATV
  • Honda's ASIMO robot gets smarter
  • Toyota's new robot can play the violin, help the aged
  • Humanoid teaches dentists to feel people's pain: researchers

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright Space.TV Corporation. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space.TV Corp on any Web page published or hosted by Space.TV Corp. Privacy Statement